From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1PvwbZ-0007lm-AX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 18:53:29 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE5501C005; Sat, 5 Mar 2011 18:53:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 314991C02B for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2011 18:52:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb42 with SMTP id 42so4712291wyb.40 for ; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 10:52:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ioh/lFijHUnxknIftxDBiiGvc2bY7U4cIRPAPFFoxZs=; b=wL1Wc3IwHA2dsMEMZzTx0WIr7jGfCNqWcAtR7fFvbOM9SErnNAWODDW3TpJ4FQvWaF 42ArtjJ4S/2OgAgF5dTXLMrs1snVxp71cUModa6toJNnPXpJNZrP/oJaOdZQLIAUv8sm cCblphSsYxiFuizDq8OE3ZhAP37yExlSESfkY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=j7HHbuJb0yD940phopFaYlzTinFhszb3V9yuzEjFLr5pKJu6hbB0lct4WUpVgyMz/K HEFHVoU10EW4Jvk0XbQUJYyCQdG7uEhVoTuSdiQT35V4AruH8T7uAi4FvUPILi/DtpGZ zTDx2oELO0Tnw/g6Ip0VJahntCjgN4d/n7DIM= Received: by 10.216.17.202 with SMTP id j52mr677691wej.36.1299351166100; Sat, 05 Mar 2011 10:52:46 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: nirbheek.chauhan@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.18.19 with HTTP; Sat, 5 Mar 2011 10:52:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1298801584.4335.0.camel@keitaro> <20110228025858.GC10154@comet> From: Nirbheek Chauhan Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2011 00:22:26 +0530 X-Google-Sender-Auth: HkRCWB0FkI2OOK-g1T-rtZD4BVk Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk 3 preparation work To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: gnome Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 95024f1b4b4b96b17b96ce57d0c2a017 On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 4:04 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrot= e: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Donnie Berkholz w= rote: >> On 11:13 Sun 27 Feb =C2=A0 =C2=A0 , Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: >>> a quick mail to announce that the gnome team, in order to prepare for >>> gnome 3, started slotting a lot of gnome team managed packages. If you >>> find yourself using such a package, please update your ebuilds to use >>> slot notations or other EAPI compliant notation resulting in the same >>> effect. >> >> This email would be much more useful if it included a list of affected >> packages, sorted by maintainer and/or herd. >> > > As requested, here is a (probably) complete list of packages which > depend on x11-libs/gtk+ without a slot. The list was generated using > the tinderbox rindex, so it may be slightly out of date. > I've started maintaining an irregularly updated list for gtk+ (and a few other libraries): http://dev.gentoo.org/~nirbheek/gnome/3.0/slotting/ The script I use to generate these lists is: http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=3Dproj/gnome.git;a=3Dblob;f=3Dscri= pts/slot_rindex.py;hb=3DHEAD If you look at the lists in that directory, you'll be able to guess that there are other libraries which need the same treatment. The list of these libraries is, however, incomplete right now. We'll be sending a mail about that later, but folks can fix deps to use slots right now if they wish. Thanks to everyone who has fixed deps of their (and other folks') packages! --=20 ~Nirbheek Chauhan Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team