From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1f49-0008DN-B6 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:22:37 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C644B1C0AE; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:22:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f53.google.com (mail-ew0-f53.google.com [209.85.215.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D27111C07C for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:21:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy1 with SMTP id 1so2026744ewy.40 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 06:21:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=PCR4i1TqwIGqqu7uk8xVeNuMEXzwoFq/cnSluh+Owoo=; b=pOiABnmPVnbR4TuIcG/a95+jsri9wEKhAzHtaa88oGRc61DPrALwzD6mbPRBRjj5OM mUyVTsatj/tb+PkqwMCezx5gBW/j0dRV4iB+MpKSgA49Kdij0piLmdxdeaADgjwUTFaq HuG6kz6/hX40s3BjJI4Yoz0QSi5WWQkuTIIIE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=uNig/b2f32kML2ASrD87P6/BMKtXvp/2zFdINmFJ4ZAP7gbnnWzyyKTbB9aQ/egcn/ OjJnGJESXEWIJuA2elvcY5wzGxLZoK8JPbMIVqu1VSbR0yCQ3mCZrXTHh+nCjga/jbb5 RCd02a9c6RrEUbvYVLfPfIo4ACZdSe4DdLu9U= Received: by 10.213.32.137 with SMTP id c9mr1766298ebd.114.1300713629247; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 06:20:29 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: vapierfilter@gmail.com Received: by 10.213.21.142 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 06:20:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110321131411.GN72718@gentoo.org> References: <4D7F1633.1080104@gentoo.org> <201103161451.47198.vapier@gentoo.org> <4D8504EC.8060407@gentoo.org> <201103201439.18493.vapier@gentoo.org> <4D872A84.4020101@gentoo.org> <20110321131411.GN72718@gentoo.org> From: Mike Frysinger Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:20:09 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: vkmmZluR0fREK2vPwgH6FHMxb-A Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: emboss.eclass as replacement for embassy.eclass To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 673fb5558d99b8c57eb862cd190f8813 On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 21-03-2011 09:04:24 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> ftell vs ftello is a bit weirder. =A0i'd say always call ftello() all >> the time and let the off_t types worry about 32 bit vs 64 bit. =A0so in >> the configure script. do something like: >> AC_CHECK_FUNCS([ftello fseeko]) > > FYI: > There is an AC_FUNC_FSEEKO macro, that is designed to deal with this > specifically, in case more is necessary. thanks, i wasnt aware of that. that probably is much better than the AC_CHECK_FUNCS invocation i posted above. -mike