From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q3DTx-0006na-P5 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:19:41 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 855881C0AF; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:19:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-iw0-f181.google.com (mail-iw0-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A03F71C090 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:18:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so1793868iwn.40 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:18:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=yumrCg7C+rBalGGYpF9ZjNQNw0FeQB2B0zJ92dnfZLc=; b=tivG4d8S1k+n0t/psMMpQJsPfm5JO23JcAsU1o3TtLgG/FyA6FsKzgS5Ga8V8cYvbv v7HOnuWTYSXPqdII9ny4caK8rD3AMLAJzFEEEqb7mGiQJtF1VUdw69rwlcCdZn6+mhbd KnIAgCR5TKZU6/eZ2aGKkh6qN3TMcuh8UyKNo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=EgYM6RKfBfKQCJS1ph3ZJFEAYVvoKqFWbkQpgvph4O/KpJKQZVmC1L+t8dgwy3B+U9 fF6hQQ0aPksqlNQ5SaxW4XATgOd/CbcmZsXdy18ZvgQsh13BsZik1xUkzbMPhdWktf5V gNAwTW/KB8C72yjn92tbvCMMfpR0G+zFjuEF0= Received: by 10.42.134.132 with SMTP id l4mr1904592ict.13.1301084314205; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:18:34 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: vapierfilter@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.11.195 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:18:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201103252057.22740.dilfridge@gentoo.org> References: <20110325074824.TAf2c206.tv@veller.net> <201103252057.22740.dilfridge@gentoo.org> From: Mike Frysinger Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 16:18:14 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: GZ35_zPZx04A4H57pnEkhuzpHVY Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 79ea34ea5264c5df573010842aace308 On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > The @gentoo.org email addresses are advantageous because they provide a pre-existing identification. Which is as strong as we will ever get with this mechanism (I think). no, it really doesnt. when we make someone a dev, they give us a ssh key and a gpg key. that is all we need. the gpg key being bound to a @gentoo.org e-mail address is completely meaningless. -mike