From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-44762-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1PxSEi-0002Er-L1
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 22:52:08 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D4861C04E;
Wed, 9 Mar 2011 22:51:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF61C1C023
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 22:51:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wwj40 with SMTP id 40so1356091wwj.10
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 09 Mar 2011 14:51:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=viP8o143s1Sqc4LEzZgycqNzGvwYQ2l+OHoU/yLqY+w=;
b=jlnvDv/5hvuNWrbfblWrKcGbAA6+qZ1pT45Kv1Bbxz7Y+sMV3khobyJr4shfAN1p/r
iFUPlBwmhqTshslfOwTHRE+FFteumfsdJEosKYTKLGSRJpswIC7HaiuIAyz1f76T6fzH
CNVVVuSll8Q9EuLoYsA+5nWccpaR2ZJE9ceBk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
b=X4MBKTPro7KXA9p/WbJ6XdxHodUHfDm3hHDihh0v/40q9iks1iA/41iSuGU/8fLW87
4KIt3KZk9YCwlhtOy55oUzVAp2ndaOJuwf4RTIpR7oyeHXYUv2xphtdr97EqpYhKQ5NV
NQyUq3BB4SA4ef/9twibAIopaOxLmfjBkK4kY=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.2.148 with SMTP id 20mr336531wbj.220.1299711093956; Wed,
09 Mar 2011 14:51:33 -0800 (PST)
Sender: freemanrich@gmail.com
Received: by 10.227.149.195 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 14:51:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.227.149.195 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 14:51:33 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4D7802A5.6070907@gentoo.org>
References: <201103091719.01383.vapier@gentoo.org>
<4D7802A5.6070907@gentoo.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 17:51:33 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: YMD3O1aKhX8IcOH5JB7qvEcdr58
Message-ID: <AANLkTi==_kv-oz8xDW-xT9JFQBJWyvtkcGTwM-s6R7L9@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] updating GLEP 1
From: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=002215974eca10e155049e1492c4
X-Archives-Salt:
X-Archives-Hash: cdb492ca28325f10e7edb5c692050817
--002215974eca10e155049e1492c4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mar 9, 2011 5:45 PM, "Petteri R=E4ty" <betelgeuse@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Have GLEPs in practice been sent to the forums? I think this requirement
> could be dropped and just have a single place for discussion.
It says either is fine, so I wouldn't call it a requirement.
However, a GLEP update warrants at least one post to -dev-announce
regardless of where it is discussed. Discussion might be more appropriate o=
n
-project depending on topic...
Rich
--002215974eca10e155049e1492c4
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<p>On Mar 9, 2011 5:45 PM, "Petteri R=E4ty" <<a href=3D"mailto=
:betelgeuse@gentoo.org">betelgeuse@gentoo.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> Have GLEPs in practice been sent to the forums? I think this requireme=
nt<br>
> could be dropped and just have a single place for discussion.</p>
<p>It says either is fine, so I wouldn't call it a requirement. </p>
<p>However, a GLEP update warrants at least one post to -dev-announce regar=
dless of where it is discussed. Discussion might be more appropriate on -pr=
oject depending on topic...</p>
<p>Rich</p>
--002215974eca10e155049e1492c4--