From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q3xba-0008Db-Bg for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 21:34:38 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4CC641C0D8; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 21:34:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-iw0-f181.google.com (mail-iw0-f181.google.com [209.85.214.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB7F61C07F for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 21:33:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn2 with SMTP id 2so3800590iwn.40 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 14:33:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=g73KhdRsWvrBZW7BA9+cvhhRMd/m5+gK1VFKEkX9K+M=; b=PL8j1u5bAg1xVpeBSg0Ac8Mh6yn/msu4R9K/NZ+vhY3Bts4gBH7ykd/YePOPGGuykN D76GdGto3wvvJVvdD5YFD81i+4bKwwOo0UcUVDhmW5z8CN9e70gsOyOD8vhEOqjoFdZ8 wa+IoMpTZGppudyo2QKjYxv59qBN71iekId0k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=nwM9OhJnEz8KCyksbO93KzFsfgJUrxUfPxKHrKGq+MnbfvrJu6ZnGzJEhz0pRl0KJA d0DEukkv28lbXcmKnJKGQbFnY9BdT8JA5c9gg2yg639f6KcNXYR1lStFsKEq5xhoGl9X KgjvaAfvjTIkmHU6pWsvO0G5OrVWw/Z9M8wa8= Received: by 10.231.140.81 with SMTP id h17mr3353602ibu.47.1301261596173; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 14:33:16 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: vapierfilter@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.11.195 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 14:32:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4D8FA878.9070005@gentoo.org> References: <4D8EF6F0.8040500@gentoo.org> <4D8FA878.9070005@gentoo.org> From: Mike Frysinger Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 17:32:56 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0m0lWNo6HLAWRFtxglscWVGd7JQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] FYI: USE="hal" masked in base/use.mask and related To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 135ffe8ff991071d7f450a35dfac9b5e On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 5:13 PM, R=E9mi Cardona wrote: > Le 27/03/2011 10:36, Samuli Suominen a =E9crit : >> Also, both udisks and upower now have blockers for sys-apps/hal to >> prevent overlapping features. > > I know you want to kill HAL with a vengeance. I don't disagree with the > ultimate goal but I think you've gone too far. > > HAL and u{power,disks} are _perfectly_ parallel installable and there > are absolutely _no_ conflicts between the two. > > Blockers should be used for _file_ conflicts, not for _feature_ > conflicts, otherwise we'd have to mask and get rid of half (or even > more) of all the packages we provide in portage. latest pciutils blocks hal, so i think that should cover the "urge people to migrate" aspect in ~arch -mike