From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1211 invoked by uid 1002); 31 Aug 2003 14:18:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 26782 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2003 14:18:47 -0000 Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 16:23:16 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v551) Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org To: leio@hercules.dustbite.org From: John Nilsson In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.551) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] What happend to portage speed? X-Archives-Salt: 2f09abce-4aa4-43bd-acbe-da4cc0d2baac X-Archives-Hash: 0363e82c6436bb70fd751ebb755093a9 Actually it seems most time is spent after each "...done" statement. -John s=F6ndagen den 31 augusti 2003 kl 16.16 skrev = leio@hercules.dustbite.org: > On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, John Nilsson wrote: > >> No, no. The download is quick. But the calculation of deptree and = that >> kind of things that takes so much time. >> >> Also what is this metadata directory? (Sorry for not RTFM). >> >> -John >> > > After every rsync it rebuilds the cache... at least by default. > That's what takes the most time with an emerge sync on my 166MHz=20 > computer. > It was discussed a while ago that the cache has changed maybe by 5%,=20= > but > it does it all again. Parses some things, writes lots of files to=20 > cache, > etc. There were ideas how to make it quick again, but unfortunately=20 > either > no-one has brought it to reality or into the official portage. > If that's not your speed problem, disregard this e-mail, but I believe > this the most time demanding operation with emerge sync as of now. > > Mart Raudsepp > > > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list