* Re: [gentoo-dev] first council meeting
@ 2005-09-16 19:12 99% ` Simon Stelling
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Simon Stelling @ 2005-09-16 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Well, if it's in ~arch it's a candidate to go to stable after further
> testing. If a package maintainer isn't prepared to have a package moved
> to stable, they shouldn't take it out of package.mask.
The 30 days are just a rule, there are enough packages which surely need a
longer testing period, even if they work flawlessly. Or would you mark gcc 4.0
stable after 30 days? I think that's what Paul wanted to say.
--
Simon Stelling
Gentoo/AMD64 Operational Co-Lead
blubb@gentoo.org
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2005-09-15 20:51 [gentoo-dev] first council meeting Aron Griffis
2005-09-16 17:42 ` Paul de Vrieze
2005-09-16 18:38 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-09-16 18:48 ` Paul de Vrieze
2005-09-16 19:02 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-09-16 19:12 99% ` Simon Stelling
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox