* Re: [gentoo-dev] "Distro Day (Measuring the benefits of the Gentoo approach)"
@ 2003-08-13 14:12 99% ` Brad Laue
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Brad Laue @ 2003-08-13 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Gentoo-dev
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> They also had no "control" group.
> It would also have been nice to have seen them test Gentoo (optimized)
> against Gentoo (non-optimized). Testing should have also been done on
> the SAME machine. Not "identical" machines, but the exact same one.
> The reason for this is there is the possibility that hardware could be
> causing a discrepancy in the results.
This is the main thing that bugs me - the programs tested were built
with no more opimizations than any other distribution uses (-O2 is
extremely common).
Another good analysis of the 'gentoo approach' would have been trends
based - if I set gnome in my USE flags, how will the featureset of my
entire system change over time? Can such features be added and removed
on the fly in other distributions? (probably not)
Brad
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2003-08-13 13:38 [gentoo-dev] "Distro Day (Measuring the benefits of the Gentoo approach)" Philippe Lafoucrière
2003-08-13 14:08 ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-08-13 14:12 99% ` Brad Laue
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox