* [gentoo-dev] GLEP 46: Allow upstream tags in metadata.xml
@ 2008-01-19 13:07 99% Tiziano Müller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Tiziano Müller @ 2008-01-19 13:07 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Current state: "Deferred"
Wanted state: "Accepted/Implemented" (at least by me)
Open questions from last discussion (March 2006):
- Is it possible/should it be possible to have more than one <maintainer>
entry?
- Is recording an upstream-status (active/inactive) a good idea?
Possibilities:
An element: <status>{active/inactive}</status>
An attribute: <maintainer status="{active/inactive}">...
- Is an additional <doc> element needed to link to upstream docs
- Must the type of <remote-id> be controlled/listed/checked?
My answers to this:
- yes
- yes. Remark: do we need to specify when upstream has to be marked as
active/inactive or can we use our common sense ?
- yes.
- not yet. Can be defined later.
Your oppinion?
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2008-01-19 13:07 99% [gentoo-dev] GLEP 46: Allow upstream tags in metadata.xml Tiziano Müller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox