* Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy
@ 2014-01-15 0:04 99% ` Tom Wijsman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Tom Wijsman @ 2014-01-15 0:04 UTC (permalink / raw
To: mjo; +Cc: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 773 bytes --]
On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 16:57:30 -0500
Michael Orlitzky <mjo@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 01/14/2014 04:37 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> >
> > 2. I would like to see the policy below applied to all arch's [2].
>
> [ ] Yup
> [X] Nope
For which reason?
I could do
[✓] Yup
[X] Nope
'cause a stable version that's no longer stable (due to found bugs)
shouldn't remain, otherwise it is falsely shown to the users as being
stable; whereas it could very well be old, insecure and buggy instead.
Together with a news message, users could appreciate this.
--
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer
E-mail address : TomWij@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2014-01-14 21:37 [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy William Hubbs
2014-01-14 21:57 ` Michael Orlitzky
2014-01-15 0:04 99% ` Tom Wijsman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox