* Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy
@ 2014-01-17 15:31 99% ` Ulrich Mueller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Ulrich Mueller @ 2014-01-17 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 558 bytes --]
>>>>> On Fri, 17 Jan 2014, grozin wrote:
> Maybe, a good solution is to introduce a special arch, "noarch", for
> such packages (similar to what's done in the rpm world). Then, if a
> package is ~noarch, it is automatically considered ~arch for all
> arches. Similar for stable. The maintainer should be able to keyword
> ~noarch and to stabilize noarch. Comments?
How would you handle dependencies in such a scenario? All dependencies
must be keyworded or stable on all architectures, before the package
can be keyworded or stabilised on noarch?
Ulrich
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2014-01-14 21:37 [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy William Hubbs
2014-01-15 11:30 ` Sergey Popov
2014-01-15 15:30 ` William Hubbs
2014-01-16 6:17 ` Sergey Popov
2014-01-17 6:06 ` grozin
2014-01-17 7:02 ` grozin
2014-01-17 15:31 99% ` Ulrich Mueller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox