public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Search results ordered by [date|relevance]  view[summary|nested|Atom feed]
thread overview below | download: 
* Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy
  @ 2014-01-17 15:31 99%           ` Ulrich Mueller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Ulrich Mueller @ 2014-01-17 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 558 bytes --]

>>>>> On Fri, 17 Jan 2014, grozin  wrote:

> Maybe, a good solution is to introduce a special arch, "noarch", for
> such packages (similar to what's done in the rpm world). Then, if a
> package is ~noarch, it is automatically considered ~arch for all
> arches. Similar for stable. The maintainer should be able to keyword
> ~noarch and to stabilize noarch. Comments?

How would you handle dependencies in such a scenario? All dependencies
must be keyworded or stable on all architectures, before the package
can be keyworded or stabilised on noarch?

Ulrich

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[relevance 99%]

Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2014-01-14 21:37     [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy William Hubbs
2014-01-15 11:30     ` Sergey Popov
2014-01-15 15:30       ` William Hubbs
2014-01-16  6:17         ` Sergey Popov
2014-01-17  6:06           ` grozin
2014-01-17  7:02             ` grozin
2014-01-17 15:31 99%           ` Ulrich Mueller

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox