* Re: FW: [gentoo-dev] Portage Integrity (Was: gcc ebuild's, downgrades, deletion etc)
@ 2003-03-16 16:48 99% ` Spider
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Spider @ 2003-03-16 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 658 bytes --]
begin quote
On Sun, 16 Mar 2003 15:23:26 +1100
"Todd Wright" <wylie@geekasylum.org> wrote:
> The ebuild I mentioned in the original post to this thread did state
> what had changed. In this case it was primarily the software version
> and some minor changes to cater for changes in the way it compiled. I
> can understand your frustration at users submitting an ebuild with no
> indication of what changed, however that was not what this thread was
> intended to discuss.
<SNIP>
I stand corrected.
//Spider
--
begin .signature
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2003-03-16 4:23 FW: [gentoo-dev] Portage Integrity (Was: gcc ebuild's, downgrades, deletion etc) Todd Wright
2003-03-16 16:48 99% ` Spider
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox