* Re: [gentoo-dev] ROX: maintainer-wanted and apps out of date
@ 2005-09-12 0:27 99% ` Stephen P. Becker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Stephen P. Becker @ 2005-09-12 0:27 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
> Thank you for the opportunity. Apparently though, my submissions have
> already been rejected Ciaran. It's important to realize that the
> submissions were intended to AID the developers, not to necessarily be
> PERFECT in every way.
Of course they have been criticized by Ciaran. In case you didn't know,
he does this for *every* maintainer-wanted ebuild. They are only
rejected as long as they have problems. If you fix them, they will be
accepted if some dev takes responsibility for them, or is recruited to
maintain them. It's really that simple Sounds like a case where you
can't stand to have anyone review your work.
> I submitted the ebuilds in good faith in the hope they would help myself
> and others get the portage tree wrt ROX up to date and correct
> breakages. In that my "spacing" was not liked, or my "descriptions" were
> too long is irrelevant.
No, it isn't irrelevant. We strive to make the portage tree to be of
high quality. Why settle for less?
-Steve
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2005-09-11 13:58 [gentoo-dev] ROX: maintainer-wanted and apps out of date Peter Hyman
2005-09-11 15:50 ` Maurice van der Pot
2005-09-11 16:42 ` Peter Hyman
2005-09-11 21:02 ` Alin Nastac
2005-09-12 0:14 ` Peter Hyman
2005-09-12 0:27 99% ` Stephen P. Becker
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox