* Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] C++ herd proposal
@ 2005-09-17 11:31 99% ` Christian Parpart
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Christian Parpart @ 2005-09-17 11:31 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1187 bytes --]
On Saturday 17 September 2005 01:20, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 16 September 2005 06:20 pm, Mark Loeser wrote:
> > Since we currently have language herds for other languages such as Ada,
> > Perl, and Java, I don't think C++ should be any different.
>
> it is different, but i dont mind the idea of having a bunch of C++ experts
> looking over a bunch of packages which otherwise may be neglected
And that's the point I see in as well - having some central point for our C++
experts/freaks. Of course, a c++ herd would not just be like ADA/Java IMO.
Though, I vote FOR such a herd (and would like to join anyway)
> > dev-libs/STLport (no-herd, vapier?)
>
> vapier/toolchain
>
> > dev-libs/fampp2 (no-herd, vapier)
> > dev-libs/ferrisloki (no-herd, vapier)
> > dev-libs/libferrisstreams (no-herd, vapier)
> > dev-db/stldb4
>
> generally i dont need help with these as the upstream author is a pretty
> cool guy and gets back to me :)
> -mike
but having some backup is always the safer way, in case some of us is AFK for
some unobvious reasons and a security patch is to be injected.
Regards,
Christian Parpart
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2005-09-16 22:20 [gentoo-dev] [RFC] C++ herd proposal Mark Loeser
2005-09-16 23:20 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-09-17 11:31 99% ` Christian Parpart
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox