* Re: [gentoo-dev] Default USE changes for fortran and mudflap?
@ 2014-01-12 8:40 99% ` Pacho Ramos
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Pacho Ramos @ 2014-01-12 8:40 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
El dom, 12-01-2014 a las 09:24 +0100, Michał Górny escribió:
> Dnia 2014-01-12, o godz. 01:53:47
> Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@gentoo.org> napisał(a):
>
> > fortran:
> > Do we want to keep enabling fortran by default? The majority of users will
> > never get the urge to install a fortran package, and the fortran eclass handles
> > those that do. I think it should be treated as all the other optional
> > languages and disabled by default, but I'd like to know if there are other
> > opinions.
>
> Well, I'd say we should work on making 'other languages' buildable
> without rebuilding the whole giant gcc stack. Especially that
> the stacked build makes it impossible to use distcc at least partially.
>
I was also wondering about what we prefer if Michal's suggestion is not
possible:
- Build support for other langs by default -> More time when we need to
emerge gcc or update it but less time as we don't need to rebuild for
that (I remember when I needed to build pdftk and needed to wait for a
gcc rebuild giving gcj support)
- Build support for other langs disabled by default -> Well, does it
save so much time to compensate the rebuilds we would need to do in the
future when we need to emerge some package some time?
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2014-01-12 7:53 [gentoo-dev] Default USE changes for fortran and mudflap? Ryan Hill
2014-01-12 8:24 ` Michał Górny
2014-01-12 8:40 99% ` Pacho Ramos
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox