* Re: [gentoo-dev] Question, Portage QOS v2
@ 2014-01-10 18:21 99% ` Ciaran McCreesh
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Ciaran McCreesh @ 2014-01-10 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 608 bytes --]
On Fri, 10 Jan 2014 21:46:18 +0400
Igor <lanthruster@gmail.com> wrote:
> And one more goal - without PortageQOS you're forever stuck with
> the legacy portage design.
>
> If the team ever decides to change Portage you'll need feedback
> on how the new portage works to patch it quickly in case there are
> troubles. It's too risky to touch portage right now. Everyone
> understands that this is a kamikaze job.
Uh, no. We already know lots of things that are wrong with the Portage
design. We also know how to fix those things. Neither of those is the
sticking point.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2014-01-10 17:18 [gentoo-dev] Question, Portage QOS v2 Igor
2014-01-10 17:20 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2014-01-10 17:46 ` Igor
2014-01-10 18:21 99% ` Ciaran McCreesh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox