public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Search results ordered by [date|relevance]  view[summary|nested|Atom feed]
thread overview below | download: 
* Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo's policy on sender id
  @ 2004-09-16 23:25 99%   ` Michiel de Bruijne
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Michiel de Bruijne @ 2004-09-16 23:25 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

On Monday 06 September 2004 01:44, Kurt Lieber wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 10:00:45AM -0400 or thereabouts, John Davis wrote:
> > Hi all -
> > Recent [1] announcements [2] from other large projects have prompted
> > this inquiry - should Gentoo adopt similar policies regarding Sender ID
> > and make a public statement or is it not worth our time?
>
> I left Debian in large part because of the stupid politics that went on in
> that project.  I want a distribution that bases its decisions on technical
> reasons, rather than political ones.
>
> Also, for the record, regardless of what decisions are made regarding
> including support for SenderID in portage, we *will* be implementing
> SenderID on our infrastructure.
>
> --kurt

Just out of curiosity; what functionality does Sender ID provide that Sender 
Policy Framework (SPF) doesn't?

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


^ permalink raw reply	[relevance 99%]

Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2004-09-05 14:00     [gentoo-dev] gentoo's policy on sender id John Davis
2004-09-05 23:44     ` Kurt Lieber
2004-09-16 23:25 99%   ` Michiel de Bruijne

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox