* Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy
@ 2014-01-15 0:46 99% ` William Hubbs
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: William Hubbs @ 2014-01-15 0:46 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1103 bytes --]
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 01:38:08AM +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 01:06:07 +0100
> "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> > Am Mittwoch, 15. Januar 2014, 00:49:28 schrieb Tom Wijsman:
> > > On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 15:37:19 -0600
> > >
> > > William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > In this situation, I see three opposite ends of choices:
> > >
> >
> > Here's another idea:
> >
> > 4. Friendly ask the arch teams / make a policy that @system packages
> > come first.
>
> Hmm, I'm wondering if that has an actual use or whether that would just
> move the problem. The bug in question that WilliamH demonstrated is
> indeed part of @system; but shouldn't be, it is due to functions.sh.
Correct; Openrc ultimately will not be part of @system; it is provided
by a virtual that is.
If you want to say @system, you have to include all rdepends of virtuals
in @system and all packages that are dependencies of any packages in
@system, at least.
Keeping track of that will be difficult at best.
William
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2014-01-14 21:37 [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy William Hubbs
2014-01-14 23:49 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-15 0:06 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2014-01-15 0:38 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-15 0:46 99% ` William Hubbs
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox