* Re: [gentoo-dev] compile time statistics
@ 2003-07-26 13:34 99% ` Rutger Lubbers
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Rutger Lubbers @ 2003-07-26 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
> > I believe gentoo-stats is already sampling a lot of the needed
> > information. An estimate could primarly be based on some "major"
> > factors; perhaps cpu-type and clock frequency. Then, if enough
> > statistics is available for the current architecture, on other settings
> > as well, sucb as -O flags and size of main memory (MAKEOPTS?). A kind of
> > hierarchical estimate... Could perhaps be hard to implement in practice
> > though (?).
> >
> > But I believe there probably is some limited set of factors that could
> > provide a reasonably good estimate.
>
> Whoever actually implements these ideas, please don't forget that you need
> a solution for capturing accurate stats on machines that use Portage's
> distcc support. Because otherwise, your stats will not be as accurate as
> you'd like.
Yeah, this crossed my mind also. I believe that using distcc would "void"
those stats, perhaps we can store it and maybe possible analyze if we can use
any of it.
Rutger
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2003-07-25 17:56 [gentoo-dev] compile time statistics Rutger Lubbers
2003-07-26 9:56 ` Håvard Wall
2003-07-26 10:05 ` Stuart Herbert
2003-07-26 13:34 99% ` Rutger Lubbers
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox