* [gentoo-dev] On dropping sparc@ from CC on bugs
[not found] ` <bug-621130-3398-g5w8kj8DWg@http.bugs.gentoo.org/>
@ 2017-09-11 7:43 99% ` Sergei Trofimovich
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Sergei Trofimovich @ 2017-09-11 7:43 UTC (permalink / raw
To: bman, gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1067 bytes --]
On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 22:18:08 +0000
bugzilla-daemon@gentoo.org wrote:
> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the person
> whose email is mentioned below. To comment on this bug, please visit:
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=621130
>
> Aaron Bauman <bman@gentoo.org> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CC|sparc@gentoo.org |
>
> --- Comment #16 from Aaron Bauman <bman@gentoo.org> ---
> sparc was dropped to exp.
>
> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=b5901d8f716555a1479f12313a2925fcadd177a9
[ CCed gentoo-dev@ to raise general awareness ]
Why do you need to drop sparc@ from CC on all the bugs?
It takes away possibility from users using sparc@ to report
test status easily. Even after the bug is closed.
sh@ and s390@ are also exp profiles and CC is one of mechanisms
to ask arch teams to try keywording/stablereq.
--
Sergei
[-- Attachment #2: Цифровая подпись OpenPGP --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
[not found] <bug-621130-3398@http.bugs.gentoo.org/>
[not found] ` <bug-621130-3398-g5w8kj8DWg@http.bugs.gentoo.org/>
2017-09-11 7:43 99% ` [gentoo-dev] On dropping sparc@ from CC on bugs Sergei Trofimovich
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox