* Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up
@ 2013-12-03 21:11 99% ` William Hubbs
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: William Hubbs @ 2013-12-03 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2104 bytes --]
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 09:32:10PM +0400, Alexander V Vershilov wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2013 1:24 AM, "Ian Stakenvicius" <axs@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > On 02/12/13 04:19 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
> > > On 12/02/2013 03:28 PM, William Hubbs wrote: [...]
> > >> Also, the other message in this thread is correct; the netifrc
> > >> use flag is temporary.
> > >
> > >> I originally planned to release openrc-0.12.x along with a
> > >> newsitem that instructed you to emerge the netifrc package if you
> > >> want the legacy network stack, but some users/devs felt that
> > >> Ishould go further to make sure netifrc remains installed on
> > >> their systems.
> > >
> > > As one of those devs, I feel now may be a good time to ask.... What
> > > are we doing about this? In my opinion, anyone removing net
> > > support from the stage3's should be killed with fire. That said, I
> > > don't care if it's netifrc or whatever as long as it is properly
> > > documented and actually usable.
> > >
> > > Thoughts on how we move forward?
> > >
> > > Thanks, Zero
> > >
> >
> > Well, part of this conversation needs to be, what is the default
> > networking stack that we want to have in gentoo? IMO that should
> > remain netifrc but that's just my personal opinion.
>
> I personally like netifrc default but there is no good way to use it as
> default we will need to keep use flag arbitrary long or add netifrc to
> @system but it will return us back to the problems of users who doesn't
> want to have netifrc on their systems. And with the rise of systems and NM
> the number of such users will grow. Anyway I'd like to see base system herd
> vote.
I would like to add a virtual/network-manager package to @system which
has the following rdepend settings:
RDEPEND=" || (
net-misc/netifrc
>=sys-apps/openrc-0.12[newnet]
net-misc/badvpn
net-misc/dhcpcd
net-misc/netctl
net-misc/NetworkManager
net-misc/wicd )"
Does anyone see an issue with setting it up this way?
William
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2013-12-01 10:20 [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up Alessandro DE LAURENZIS
2013-12-02 20:28 ` William Hubbs
2013-12-02 21:19 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-12-02 21:24 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2013-12-03 17:32 ` Alexander V Vershilov
2013-12-03 21:11 99% ` William Hubbs
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox