* Re: [gentoo-dev] Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives
@ 2009-02-26 18:20 99% ` Ciaran McCreesh
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Ciaran McCreesh @ 2009-02-26 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 731 bytes --]
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:07:32 +0000
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com> wrote:
> There's a less extreme variant on this that's slightly cleaner, and
> with appropriate weaseling is also less messy. Simply add the
> following very carefully worded additional requirement for future
> EAPIs, and retroactively impose it upon current ones:
>
> If EAPI is to be set, it must be set strictly before any global scope
> command or package manager defined function is called. Once set, EAPI
> must not be set to a different value.
...not quite weasely enough. Also needs:
and before any package manager defined variables are used or package
manager set shell behaviour is relied upon.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2009-02-24 22:21 [gentoo-dev] Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives Petteri Räty
2009-02-26 18:07 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2009-02-26 18:20 99% ` Ciaran McCreesh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox