* Re: [gentoo-dev] making the stable tree more up-to-date
@ 2011-12-16 13:53 99% ` Rich Freeman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Rich Freeman @ 2011-12-16 13:53 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:27 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
<phajdan.jr@gentoo.org> wrote:
> - people complain that a week-long timeout is too short, while after I
> CC arches the answer often comes within minutes.
So, I agree with pretty-much everything you said, and I completely
agree that stable-by-default, object-if-you-care is the right move.
That said, there is probably room for debate over the length of time
we leave the bug open. Maybe a week isn't quite long enough - maybe
two weeks is better.
Then again, if I as a maintainer had reservations I'd be very likely
to at least post a comment within a week even if I couldn't actually
resolve the issue decisively in that time.
Rich
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2011-11-21 8:41 [gentoo-dev] making the stable tree more up-to-date "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2011-12-16 10:42 ` justin
2011-12-16 13:27 ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2011-12-16 13:53 99% ` Rich Freeman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox