* Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role
@ 2006-02-28 15:17 99% ` Paul de Vrieze
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Paul de Vrieze @ 2006-02-28 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 882 bytes --]
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 15:52, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Yes, it's an utterly trivial problem, but it is a QA violation. Getting
> a complete list is something that takes a heck of a lot longer, and I
> have yet to be convinced that my time would not be better spent
> elsewhere.
Where is a coding style problem related to quality of code in general and
assurance in particular? This is something that repoman might check for,
and issue a warning. It has nothing to do with end-user quality. It even
is no problem for developers trying to understand the ebuild. It is only
a coding style violation, not a QA violation. Coding style is to present
a uniform view to things, so things look proper. QA is about things being
proper, not looking proper.
Paul
--
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 200 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2006-02-26 22:22 [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role Mark Loeser
2006-02-28 9:38 ` Re[2]: " Jakub Moc
2006-02-28 14:52 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-02-28 15:17 99% ` Paul de Vrieze
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox