* Re: [gentoo-dev] making the stable tree more up-to-date
@ 2011-12-16 11:06 99% ` Agostino Sarubbo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Agostino Sarubbo @ 2011-12-16 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 702 bytes --]
On Friday 16 December 2011 11:42:15 justin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I really like that you open all those bugs. But it makes no sense to add
> arches after a "time out".
Personally, I agree with have "more stable packages in tree", but I just point
out one thing. If me, or another arch tester find ebuild issue(s) and
maintainers does not care of it, makes no sense imho.
I mark stable with a script and I'm uncomfortable to fix them. As Justin said,
all maintainers are responsible of their packages, so I'd prefer to not touch
other stuff.
If you(for any developers) are busy and/or you can't fix them, feel free to
mail me or just give an "ack" via irc and I'll provide to fix.
Regards
Agostino
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2011-11-21 8:41 [gentoo-dev] making the stable tree more up-to-date "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2011-12-16 10:42 ` justin
2011-12-16 11:06 99% ` Agostino Sarubbo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox