* Re: [gentoo-dev] Policies (was: [RFC] QA Team's role)
@ 2006-02-28 18:35 99% ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2006-02-28 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 11:39, Jakub Moc wrote:
> 28.2.2006, 17:24:21, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> > If you don't agree with the contents, why didn't you raise your
> > opposition earlier?
>
> I don't feel any need to raise opposition against some unofficial manual,
> what would be the point in that? I'm raising my hand against silently
> incorporating parts of it (that affect a lot of stuff in the tree) into
> official docs without a proper discussion, even more so that they are being
> claimed as an official QA policy now. Documents located in private devspace
> of some devs are non-official and noone checks their contents for
> correctness, they are private activity of those devs.
input was solicited from the developer community before about ciaranm's
unofficial manual with notes that the plan was to incorporate it piece by
piece into the official dev handbook
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2006-02-26 22:22 [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role Mark Loeser
2006-02-28 16:24 ` [gentoo-dev] Policies (was: [RFC] QA Team's role) Danny van Dyk
2006-02-28 16:39 ` Jakub Moc
2006-02-28 18:35 99% ` Mike Frysinger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox