* Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion related with dropping keywords policy
@ 2010-06-17 12:04 99% ` Pacho Ramos
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Pacho Ramos @ 2010-06-17 12:04 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1096 bytes --]
El jue, 17-06-2010 a las 06:07 +0200, Jeroen Roovers escribió:
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 07:39:01 -0400
> Joseph Jezak <josejx@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> > Your preferred method is exactly how (as a ppc keyworder) I like to
> > see these kind of bugs handled. Dropping keywords makes an awful lot
> > more work for us and hurts our users, especially since we're not
> > always very prompt at handling bugs.
>
> Well, reasoning for the HPPA team, which maintains an architecture
> that is dying rather more quickly than PPC32 (which still has all kinds
> of embedded uses and so on),, in favour of IA64, I'd rather see dropped
> keywords than new profile entries, possibly with the keyworded ebuilds
> being gradually removed after an OK. That way I can make a choice to
> keep a package (set) for a bit or to stop supporting it immediately.
>
In that case, could you then consider to un-CC from keywording bugs hppa
team is not willing to fix? I think it would help a lot to "clean" the
tree of old versions that are been kept as it's the inly keyworded on
hppa
Thanks a lot
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2010-06-11 9:27 [gentoo-dev] Suggestion related with dropping keywords policy Pacho Ramos
2010-06-11 11:39 ` Joseph Jezak
2010-06-17 4:07 ` Jeroen Roovers
2010-06-17 12:04 99% ` Pacho Ramos
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox