* Re: [gentoo-dev] [git migration] The problem of ChangeLog generation
@ 2010-04-14 1:47 99% ` Richard Freeman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Richard Freeman @ 2010-04-14 1:47 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On 04/13/2010 12:33 PM, Matti Bickel wrote:
> Alec Warner wrote:
>> Its not possible in perforce once your change has been submitted.
>
> Oh, missed that one. Maybe that makes perforce more "auditble" or whatnot.
I suspect that is the gist of it. I work with numerous systems that
have audit trails that are subject to regulation, and it is pretty
typical that the way to "correct" an audit trail entry is to add an
additional audit trail entry (with the old entry still being there -
perhaps with a pointer to the new entry). There is no shame in
admitting that you made a mistake - the kinds of people who audit these
systems look at a lack of mistakes as evidence that something is being
hidden.
Rich
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2010-04-06 2:13 [gentoo-dev] [git migration] The problem of ChangeLog generation Nirbheek Chauhan
2010-04-13 11:25 ` Peter Volkov
2010-04-13 11:48 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2010-04-13 13:19 ` Ulrich Mueller
2010-04-13 13:35 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2010-04-13 16:12 ` Matti Bickel
2010-04-13 16:23 ` Alec Warner
2010-04-13 16:33 ` Matti Bickel
2010-04-14 1:47 99% ` Richard Freeman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox