* Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role
@ 2006-02-28 16:04 99% ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2006-02-28 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Monday 27 February 2006 11:47, Lance Albertson wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 17:53:20 -0800 Donnie Berkholz
> >
> > <spyderous@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > | The maintainer should be the absolute authority over his/her packages,
> > | and only the council should be able to overrule maintainer decisions
> > | in the case of disagreement between the maintainer and anybody else.
> >
> > So if the maintainer sticks SANDBOX_DISABLE="1" rm -fr / in global scope
> > and refuses to move it, QA will have to get council approval to fix it?
>
> Use some common sense when showing an example please. We all know that
> something that stupid needs to be delt with quickly.
we've had at least one ebuild do stuff in /tmp in global scope ... of course
that was a mistake the dev felt really bad about and it was fixed once
noticed, so not sure this is an appropriate example ;)
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2006-02-26 22:22 [gentoo-dev] [RFC] QA Team's role Mark Loeser
2006-02-27 16:35 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2006-02-27 16:47 ` Lance Albertson
2006-02-28 16:04 99% ` Mike Frysinger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox