* Re: [gentoo-dev] Should that file be a License ?
@ 2009-02-27 8:18 99% ` Rémi Cardona
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Rémi Cardona @ 2009-02-27 8:18 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Le 27/02/2009 06:32, Jeremy Olexa a écrit :
> bump. Can anyone help out here? Is it a license or a doc?
I would say it is in fact a license, but since all it seems to do is to
confirm that whatever GnuGk does under the GPLv2 is allowed, I wouldn't
necessarily put it in the license dir. But do include it in the doc dir.
Nota Bene: IANAL
Cheers,
Rémi
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2009-02-21 15:21 [gentoo-dev] Should that file be a License ? Mounir Lamouri
2009-02-23 15:44 ` Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
2009-02-23 16:02 ` Mounir Lamouri
2009-02-27 5:32 ` Jeremy Olexa
2009-02-27 8:18 99% ` Rémi Cardona
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox