public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Search results ordered by [date|relevance]  view[summary|nested|Atom feed]
thread overview below | download: 
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Optimized Qt
  @ 2002-06-08 10:42 99%     ` Alexander Holler
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Alexander Holler @ 2002-06-08 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

Hello,

--On Samstag, Juni 08, 2002 12:07:17 +0300 Dan Armak <danarmak@gentoo.org> 
wrote:

> Please see bug #1571. I haven't had time to "investigate" beyond what the
> comments say. If we could get a good rule of what CFLAGS work and what
> don't  I'd be willing to itroduce the thing into the qt ebuilds.

I've just got the same bug with reloads building qt3 with customized 
CFLAGS. This gcc bug looks like some bugs I've got trying to build gentoo 
with gcc 3.1. With the difference that gcc 3.1 kindly asks for filling out 
bug reports. ;)

And I agree that it isn't a good idea to use customized flags if qmake 
records these flags for future buildings (specially the processor flags).

Alexander



^ permalink raw reply	[relevance 99%]

Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
     [not found]     <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206071146010.14744-100000@thunderbird.junta.iitk. ac.in>
2002-06-08  8:23     ` [gentoo-dev] Optimized Qt Alexander Holler
2002-06-08  9:07       ` Dan Armak
2002-06-08 10:42 99%     ` Alexander Holler

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox