* Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage through SSH
@ 2003-09-01 5:53 99% ` oom
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: oom @ 2003-09-01 5:53 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Pardon me if i'm missing the point.. but would something like:
[1]dsh -a emerge -ku sendmail
be usefull in this type of situation?
Assuming of course you had a server with the binarys (i486 or whatever
is most suitable) avaialble by ftp or something
You could prolly do this over ssh forwarding, or stunnel too so all
transactions were secure.
[1] dsh (1) - Distributed shell, or dancer's shell
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 11:31, Steven Elling wrote:
> On Sunday 31 August 2003 13:14, John Nilsson wrote:
> > Some requirement thoughts:
> > A network of gentoo hosts should have only one portage processing server
> > and any number of installation leafs.
> >
> > First of all portage needs to easily handle more than one installation.
> > Second the "leaf-installations" should have a very strict minimum
> > requiremnts.
> > Third redundancy is probably important. The information to restore a
> > lost "leaf" should be availible on booth the portage host and on the
> > leaf it self.
>
> I'm not familar with cfengine but can it be adapted to perform this or
> something similar?
>
>
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2003-08-31 15:01 [gentoo-dev] Portage through SSH Douglas Russell
2003-08-31 16:52 ` Georgi Georgiev
2003-08-31 18:14 ` John Nilsson
2003-08-31 23:31 ` Steven Elling
2003-09-01 5:53 99% ` oom
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox