* Re: [gentoo-dev] Non-x86 arches: Is distcc-2.8-r2 stable?
@ 2003-08-11 19:12 99% ` Michael Cummings
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Michael Cummings @ 2003-08-11 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 01:19:28PM -0400, Lisa Marie Seelye wrote:
> Well since I haven't heard anything from the non-x86 people I'm going to
> bump 2.8-r2 to stable on those arches and 2.9 to x86 (I'll post a formal
> announcement after I get 2.10 in).
*eek!!*
/me hides from the fall out
seriously, would not recommend it. Have you assigned bugs to the arch's for
testing? x86 is easy, but for the arch's there's always a lack of manpower
undercutting their ability to test new stuff - they're usually busy making
sure the currently supported stuff is still working.
--
-----o()o---------------------------------------------
| http://www.gentoo.org/
| #gentoo-dev on irc.freenode.net
Gentoo Dev | #gentoo-perl on irc.freenode.net
Perl Guy |
| GnuPG Key ID: AB5CED4E9E7F4E2E
-----o()o---------------------------------------------
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2003-08-06 0:41 [gentoo-dev] Non-x86 arches: Is distcc-2.8-r2 stable? Lisa Marie Seelye
2003-08-11 17:19 ` Lisa Marie Seelye
2003-08-11 19:12 99% ` Michael Cummings
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox