* Re: [gentoo-dev] Use of use.mask
@ 2011-04-30 19:16 99% ` Anthony G. Basile
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Anthony G. Basile @ 2011-04-30 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On 04/30/2011 02:47 PM, Ole Markus With wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was thinking of adding SVN snapshot ebuilds of PHP to the tree.
> Ebuilds for PHP extensions use USE_EXPAND to decide which slots (and
> thus, which ABIs) of PHP the extension should be built for, much like
> ruby does. A new USE_EXPAND USE flag should therefore be added for the
> SVN snapshot slot. The problem is that the ABI is not stable and should
> only be used by people who 'know what they are doing', and the snapshot
> ebuilds will probably always be without keywords. This will cause some
> dependency problems.
>
> The only solution I could think of would be to add this new USE flag to
> use.mask. But as far as I could tell, use.mask is meant for masking USE
> flags that do not work on certain architectures etc. It is also a bit
> tricky for users to unmask USE flags.
>
> Is this still the best way to do this? Or are there any better ways that
> I did not think of?
>
> Cheers,
> Ole Markus
>
I don't see that this is much different in philosophy than p.masking
experimental/broken ebuilds which we add to the tree for dev only
testing. In both cases a user who thinks they 'know what they're doing'
can locally unmask, at their own risk.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail : blueness@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 8040 5A4D 8709 21B1 1A88 33CE 979C AF40 D045 5535
GnuPG ID : D0455535
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2011-04-30 18:47 [gentoo-dev] Use of use.mask Ole Markus With
2011-04-30 19:16 99% ` Anthony G. Basile
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox