* Re: [gentoo-dev] doinst recursive?
@ 2002-06-04 13:08 99% ` Paul de Vrieze
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Paul de Vrieze @ 2002-06-04 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Tuesday 04 June 2002 14:42, Marko Mikulicic wrote:
> Dan Naumov wrote:
> > There is no real difference between an updated 1.1a system and a 1.2
> > system. Also, this problem with acroread is a known bug. Do a search for
> > it on Gentoo Bugzilla.
>
> Thank you. I cannot find the bug report.
> However I wish to know one thing:
> "doins" will install its arguments. can it do it recursively, with
> some switch. Where can I find the sources of the "doins" function ?
>
> thanks,
>
/usr/lib/portage/bin/doins
Paul
ps the bug is allready resolved
--
Paul de Vrieze
Junior Researcher
Mail: pauldv@cs.kun.nl
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2002-06-04 12:06 [gentoo-dev] doinst recursive? Marko Mikulicic
2002-06-04 12:21 ` Dan Naumov
2002-06-04 12:42 ` Marko Mikulicic
2002-06-04 13:08 99% ` Paul de Vrieze
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox