* Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag: logrotate
@ 2005-04-29 9:32 99% ` Christian Birchinger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Christian Birchinger @ 2005-04-29 9:32 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 05:18:07PM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> As an aside, my preference would be to install them by default, but
> allow a nologrotate equivalent to "nodoc", "noinfo", or "noman". That
> would require hacking portage, though, which seems silly for something
> so trivial. Does anybody remember why we chose "nodoc", "noinfo", and
> "noman" instead of a generic INSTALL_MASK="/usr/share/doc
> /usr/share/man ..." flag which could be more general?
I would really really really like an install mask for various places
and also wondered about the noman noinfo solution after it got
implemented. There are many places where i hate files being
installed by portage (like the BIND dir with it's example and
localhost zones).
Christian
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2005-04-28 8:30 [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag: logrotate Henrik Brix Andersen
2005-04-28 19:48 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-04-28 20:16 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2005-04-28 20:21 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-04-28 22:18 ` Grant Goodyear
2005-04-29 9:32 99% ` Christian Birchinger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox