* Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy
@ 2014-01-15 17:04 99% ` Tom Wijsman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Tom Wijsman @ 2014-01-15 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw
To: pinkbyte; +Cc: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 763 bytes --]
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 15:40:20 +0400
Sergey Popov <pinkbyte@gentoo.org> wrote:
> As i said earlier for similar proposals - the one option that i see
> here to make all things going better - to recruit more people in arch
> teams/arch testers. Other options lead us to nowhere, when stable
> will be eliminated or transformed into fake.
If eventually our existing approach yields no or worsening results, it
would leads us nowhere as well; we can pick that option a few times,
but if it doesn't improve anything we'll need to start reconsidering.
--
With kind regards,
Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
Gentoo Developer
E-mail address : TomWij@gentoo.org
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2014-01-14 21:37 [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy William Hubbs
2014-01-14 23:49 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-15 11:40 ` Sergey Popov
2014-01-15 17:04 99% ` Tom Wijsman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox