* Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage ebuild cruft
@ 2005-04-29 14:38 99% ` Jason Stubbs
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Jason Stubbs @ 2005-04-29 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 847 bytes --]
On Friday 29 April 2005 23:26, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
> On Friday 29 Apr 2005 15:11, Jason Wever wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > > The initialization time of portage is directly related to the number of
> > > packages installed. Cutting out excess ebuilds from the tree won't
> > > speed this up at all. Cutting out excess ebuilds won't have much effect
> > > on the general running of emerge at all, actually, except for updating
> > > the cache after syncing.
> >
> > Does that include the about >=10 second delay when emerge is first run on
> > a box after a reboot before you get any visible output on the screen, or
> > is that an entirely different problem?
>
> Heh, I get that after every invocation of emerge. :)
Yep. That's the scanning of all installed packages for any provided virtuals.
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2005-04-28 16:40 [gentoo-dev] Portage ebuild cruft Heinrich Wendel
2005-04-29 14:11 ` Jason Wever
2005-04-29 14:26 ` Elfyn McBratney
2005-04-29 14:38 99% ` Jason Stubbs
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox