public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Search results ordered by [date|relevance]  view[summary|nested|Atom feed]
thread overview below | download: 
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy
  @ 2014-01-23 20:55 99%                       ` Steev Klimaszewski
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Steev Klimaszewski @ 2014-01-23 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev; +Cc: slong

On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 20:13 +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > I don't think that's what was being proposed, though. The question was
> > really the old complaint about slow architectures; the "-* arch"
> > solution sounds like the most reasonable definition of "dropping"
> > keywords, in the absence of AT communication otherwise.
> 
> Dropping keywords and specifying -* are a world apart of each other.
> 
> The former means that it is not ready for wide stable or testing users,
> the latter means that it has been tested to not work at all;
> furthermore, we need to explicitly specify which arches in that case.
> 
The complaint is slow to stable arches - by specifying "-* arch" it
would signify that ONLY that arch uses that version of the ebuild - and
it would be up to the arch team to remove it once they've stabled the
new version - and considering the complaint is only about slow arches,
there's nothing additional to specify in there - it's REMOVING arches
that have stabled a newer version already, so they are unaffected.  

On the other hand, you're suggesting that we don't actually bother with
stabling things - or actually testing that things are properly stable,
allowing anyone to decide when something is stable, whether they have
access to the hardware to actually test that it works.  You and a few
others keep talking in the theoretical while I've shown an actual
problem but you and the others conveniently ignore ACTUAL problems in
favor of your possible problems.  Please stop.




^ permalink raw reply	[relevance 99%]

Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2014-01-15  1:11     [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy Michael Orlitzky
2014-01-15  1:23     ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-15  1:36       ` Michael Orlitzky
2014-01-15  2:09         ` William Hubbs
2014-01-15  2:21           ` Michael Orlitzky
2014-01-15  2:46             ` William Hubbs
2014-01-16  7:28               ` Christopher Head
2014-01-16 22:44                 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-19 22:31                   ` Christopher Head
2014-01-20  0:47                     ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-23 18:12                       ` [gentoo-dev] " Steven J. Long
2014-01-23 19:13                         ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-23 20:55 99%                       ` Steev Klimaszewski

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox