* Re: [gentoo-dev] first council meeting
@ 2005-09-16 22:23 99% ` Maurice van der Pot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Maurice van der Pot @ 2005-09-16 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 974 bytes --]
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 05:50:39PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> actually, going with say 'testing.mask' instead of '?arch' may be better ...
> reinforce the fact that this is a package-level issue rather than
> arch-specific
Let me get things straight. We would want this because it's the least of
two evils?
On one hand ?arch isn't nice because it's package-level instead of
arch-specific, so it doesn't belong among keywords.
On the other hand testing.mask (if it's like package.mask) takes this
(package-level) stuff and moves it out of the ebuilds it belongs to and
dumps it all in one file.
So we'd want this because we don't want to introduce something new in
the ebuilds?
Just getting things straight before expressing my opinion explicitly =]
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer griffon26@gentoo.org http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe! griffon26@kfk4ever.com http://www.kfk4ever.com
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2005-09-15 20:51 [gentoo-dev] first council meeting Aron Griffis
2005-09-16 20:25 ` Daniel Ostrow
2005-09-16 20:43 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-09-16 21:50 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-09-16 22:23 99% ` Maurice van der Pot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox