public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Search results ordered by [date|relevance]  view[summary|nested|Atom feed]
thread overview below | download: 
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Winex-cvs being removed from portage?
  @ 2003-07-26  0:20 99%     ` Luke-Jr
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Luke-Jr @ 2003-07-26  0:20 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Adrian Almenar; +Cc: Owen Gunden, gentoo-dev

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Yes, however, I believe WINE used a different license (BSD perhaps) at one 
point and changed to LGPL later. It it likely that WineX was forked from the 
earlier version.

On Friday 25 July 2003 02:31 pm, Adrian Almenar wrote:
> Winex is derived from wine and wine is NOT GPL is LGPL, AFAIK.
>
> Luke-Jr wrote:
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >I'm not 100% sure, but I don't think WineX is licensed under the GPL.
> > Also, the GPL only requires that they give you the source with the
> > binary. As long as the subscribers can get the source with the binary,
> > nothing would stop them from denying the public access to it.
> >
> >On Friday 25 July 2003 03:47 am, Owen Gunden wrote:
> >>On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 10:01:37PM -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> >>>How about because they asked us to?  Essentially, we have been asked to
> >>>not create an automated process to allow a user to install winex from
> >>>cvs.  The anonymous cvs is there for people to assist in development
> >>>with winex.  Technically, there is nothing stopping us from continuing
> >>>to provide winex-cvs ebuilds.  However, Gentoo is part of a larger
> >>>community and quite simply, you don't maintain your status as a useful
> >>>member of the community if you go around pissing off your neighbors.  In
> >>>fact, there is nothing keeping Transgaming from pulling the anonymous
> >>>cvs access for the winex sources from sourceforge and making it
> >>>available to subscriber's only.
> >>
> >>Then why is the anonymous cvs access available in the first place?  Also,
> >>are you sure they don't have to release the source because of the GPL?
> >>IANAL, and I certainly don't know what I'm talking about.  Just
> >> wondering.
> >>
> >>Owen
> >>
> >>--
> >>gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> >
> >- --
> >Luke-Jr
> >Developer, Gentoo Linux
> >http://www.gentoo.org/
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
> >
> >iD8DBQE/ILOiZl/BHdU+lYMRAvwnAJ0ft8tV4scOUrRsLikg/K1bN49yGgCgj5fn
> >C2eS/837fRlpQ4EmPl7v0Pg=
> >=e47W
> >-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> >
> >--
> >gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

- -- 
Luke-Jr
Developer, Gentoo Linux
http://www.gentoo.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/Ick9Zl/BHdU+lYMRAuHCAJ975znnsj45xXIKHJXe3YEJbO3fZQCdF9lh
Xw89+jJf4v2WFR0LkfNGMSY=
=4m/s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


^ permalink raw reply	[relevance 99%]

Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2003-07-23  5:08     [gentoo-dev] Winex-cvs being removed from portage? dean .
2003-07-25  4:35     ` Luke-Jr
2003-07-25 14:31       ` Adrian Almenar
2003-07-26  0:20 99%     ` Luke-Jr

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox