public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Search results ordered by [date|relevance]  view[summary|nested|Atom feed]
thread overview below | download: 
* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Add a KEYWORD representing any arch
  @ 2014-01-20 19:25 99%           ` Steev Klimaszewski
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Steev Klimaszewski @ 2014-01-20 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

On Sun, 2014-01-19 at 10:46 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Now what problem are we trying to solve? As I see it, it is mainly
> one of manpower, namely that some arch teams cannot keep up with
> stable requests, and I doubt that any technical solution will help
> to solve this. Introducing a "noarch" keyword or allowing "*" will
> potentially cause problems with dependency resolution.
> 
> Instead, we should come up with a clear set of rules under what
> circumstances package maintainers are allowed to stabilise ebuilds
> themselves on all architectures.
> 

When they have machines that cover all architectures - assuming there is
some sort of machine code at all.  Otherwise, why even bother having
stable keywords?  Everyone keeps going on about how they will
potentially have issues because something old is stable - I've thrown
out that maybe we should (after a certain amount of time - when cleaning
maybe?) remove all keywords except the only stable one, and then leaving
it up to the slow arches.  

I know what the dev manual says, but I'd much rather have an old ebuild
that's KEYWORDS="-* arm" than have that ebuild removed because a new one
is KEYWORDS="arm" that doesn't work at all. Everyone else keeps talking
in the theoretical, and I'm talking an actual issue.  This affects me
and my workflow and ask ryao about how he wanted to emerge git-9999 to
look into fixing it...


-- steev




^ permalink raw reply	[relevance 99%]

Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2014-01-14 21:37     [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy William Hubbs
2014-01-17  6:06     ` grozin
2014-01-17  7:02       ` grozin
2014-01-19  8:36         ` Mike Frysinger
2014-01-19  9:28           ` Add a KEYWORD representing any arch (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy) Pacho Ramos
2014-01-19  9:46             ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Add a KEYWORD representing any arch Ulrich Mueller
2014-01-20 19:25 99%           ` Steev Klimaszewski

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox