* Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy
@ 2014-01-15 1:11 99% ` Michael Orlitzky
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Michael Orlitzky @ 2014-01-15 1:11 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On 01/14/2014 08:08 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>
> This is under the assumption that the user knows of the state of the
> stabilization worsening; if the user is unaware of that change, the
> "could have done anyway" might be less common and first something bad
> would need to happen before they realize the worsened stabilization.
>
If I don't realize it, it ain't broke.
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2014-01-14 21:37 [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy William Hubbs
2014-01-14 21:57 ` Michael Orlitzky
2014-01-14 22:33 ` William Hubbs
2014-01-14 22:43 ` Michael Orlitzky
2014-01-14 23:11 ` William Hubbs
2014-01-15 0:47 ` Michael Orlitzky
2014-01-15 1:08 ` Tom Wijsman
2014-01-15 1:11 99% ` Michael Orlitzky
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox