* Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?
@ 2010-04-04 9:16 99% ` Nirbheek Chauhan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Nirbheek Chauhan @ 2010-04-04 9:16 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 04/04/2010 12:35 AM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
>> You are trying to remove a valid status for a case that has been badly
>> managed ??? Speaking for gnome herd, afaik, all bugs marked LATER are
>> for the simple reason they will be done later and no other status would
>> be fine expect REJECTED maybe, but we don't want to say that to the face
>> of the reported like this do we ?
>>
>
> And why not just keep them open as suggested?
>
Because often there is no reason whatsoever to keep it open. People
want a package to be bumped that we *know* has been released, is in
the overlay (or will end up there soon), and will go into the tree
with GNOME 2.30. I see no reason whatsoever to keep it open. If we
start doing that, we'll end up with tons of extra bugs on our hands.
We already have pages that have the status of bumped packages,[1] so
we know what needs to be done.
1. http://dev.gentoo.org/~nirbheek/gnome/2.30/status.html
--
~Nirbheek Chauhan
Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2010-04-03 9:50 [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla? Petteri Räty
2010-04-03 21:35 ` Gilles Dartiguelongue
2010-04-04 9:05 ` Petteri Räty
2010-04-04 9:16 99% ` Nirbheek Chauhan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox