public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Search results ordered by [date|relevance]  view[summary|nested|Atom feed]
thread overview below | download: 
* [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?
@ 2010-04-03  9:50 99% Petteri Räty
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Petteri Räty @ 2010-04-03  9:50 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 444 bytes --]

I don't think later is valid resolution. If there's a valid bug it just
means it's never looked at again. If the bug is not valid then a
different resolution should be used. So what do you think about
disabling later? I would like to avoid things like this:

https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113121#c21

Not applicable to the bug above but in general our social contract says:
"We will not hide problems"

Regards,
Petteri


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 900 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[relevance 99%]

Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2010-04-03  9:50 99% [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla? Petteri Räty

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox