* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The usefulness of test in FEATURES
@ 2005-05-01 8:59 99% ` Jason Stubbs
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Jason Stubbs @ 2005-05-01 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 569 bytes --]
On Sunday 01 May 2005 04:43, R Hill wrote:
> Maybe a way of lessening the annoyance of test failures would be having
> a way to resume the build at the install phase. I'm thinking of
> something similar the touch ${BUILDDIR}/.compiled trick. as it is, if
> you remove test from FEATURES, touch .tested, and then 'ebuild
> foo.ebuild install' the tests still run. This is especially frustrating
> when you've just spent 6 hours compiling a package to have it fail
> because of sandboxing.
Fixed so that testing is not run when .tested exists.
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2005-04-30 13:48 [gentoo-dev] The usefulness of test in FEATURES Maurice van der Pot
2005-04-30 19:43 ` [gentoo-dev] " R Hill
2005-05-01 8:59 99% ` Jason Stubbs
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox