* Re: [gentoo-dev] Inconsistent flag name in some packages? webm and vpx speifically
@ 2012-04-07 11:59 99% ` Aaron W. Swenson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Aaron W. Swenson @ 2012-04-07 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 04/07/2012 07:52 AM, Paweł Rumian wrote:
> Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org>:
>
>> Thank you for your report. Yes this looks like an issue. If I had
>> to choose I'd pick 'vpx' but it seems to me that media-video@
>> and mozilla@ teams needs to reach consensus.
>
> Should I poke them in any way? Reopen and assign the bug to them?
>
> BR, Paweł Rumian
>
Yes. Yes.
I'd vote that the flag name should be 'webm' as that's more readily
recognizable than 'vpx'.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iF4EAREIAAYFAk+ALAQACgkQVxOqA9G7/aBe8gEAj2LSviLEzQasFXmJzjT0oiHp
cEuId91yPkkdWH3sZbUA/29RjvgHCA/gCmKIfkq1arV0z7ZbsP11bBezwUoxcW1f
=GG+2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2012-04-03 16:33 [gentoo-dev] Inconsistent flag name in some packages? webm and vpx speifically Paweł Rumian
2012-04-03 20:15 ` Markos Chandras
2012-04-07 11:52 ` Paweł Rumian
2012-04-07 11:59 99% ` Aaron W. Swenson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox