* [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-user] "etc-update" versus Manual update opinions..
[not found] <OLEMJKKJBJMMNIPIEKLLGENIDBAA.Gwendolyn.van.der.Linden@technolution.nl>
@ 2003-09-17 15:02 99% ` Stroller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Stroller @ 2003-09-17 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user; +Cc: gentoo-dev
On 17 Sep 2003, at 1:24 pm, Gwendolyn van der Linden wrote:
> brett holcomb [mailto:brettholcomb@charter.net] wrote:
>
>> Well, if you use etc-update on files like /etc/fstab your
>> system will break.
>
> Exactly. I would vote for keeping /etc/fstab.example in portage, and
> making the copying/editing part of the installation procedure (cp
> /etc/fstab.example /etc/fstab; nano -w /etc/fstab).
I agree. I wouldn't be surprised if this was changed, were you to file
it as a bug. I'm cross posting to gentoo-dev to see what they think.
Stroller.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
[not found] <OLEMJKKJBJMMNIPIEKLLGENIDBAA.Gwendolyn.van.der.Linden@technolution.nl>
2003-09-17 15:02 99% ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-user] "etc-update" versus Manual update opinions Stroller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox