* Re: [gentoo-dev] Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives
@ 2009-02-28 19:39 99% ` Robert Bridge
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Robert Bridge @ 2009-02-28 19:39 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
Petteri Räty wrote:
> 2) EAPI in file extension
> - Allows changing global scope and the internal format of the ebuild
> a) .ebuild-<eapi>
> - ignored by current Portage
> b) .<eapi>.ebuild
> - current Portage does not work with this
> c) .<eapi>.<new extension>
> - ignored by current Portage
I have been thinking about this specific option. I will admit I don't
know if this has already been noted, but would this create the
possibility of multiple ebuilds with the same $C/$P-$PV?
Currently the filesystem enforces the uniqueness of that tuple, will
that uniqueness be allowed to lapse? (i.e. allow multiple ebuilds for
the same $C/$P-$PV with different EAPIs?)
If not, how is anyone proposing to enforce the uniqueness here?
Just a silly thought...
RobbieAB
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2009-02-24 22:21 [gentoo-dev] Collecting opinions about GLEP 55 and alternatives Petteri Räty
2009-02-28 19:39 99% ` Robert Bridge
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox