* Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Request of news item review: 2013-03-29-udev-predictable-network-interface-names.en.txt
@ 2013-03-31 11:36 99% ` Andreas K. Huettel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Andreas K. Huettel @ 2013-03-31 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 895 bytes --]
Am Sonntag, 31. März 2013, 03:17:52 schrieb Samuli Suominen:
> Nothing is stopping you from leaving out the symlink either and
> migrating to the new name despite using only 1 network card either,
> it's still more reliable than the kernel names
Why should I?
Kernel behaviour is traditionally way more stable than udev behaviour. If my
driver for my only one network card has always produced eth0 as device name,
chances are good it will do so still in a few years, after re-shuffling the
cards in my casing, and even after exchanging the whole motherboard.
Whereas with udev I can probably expect random things at random times for each
of these events.
Also, should I have problems with a new kernel, I can always just boot back
into an old one without much ado.
--
Andreas K. Huettel
Gentoo Linux developer
dilfridge@gentoo.org
http://www.akhuettel.de/
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 966 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2013-03-29 8:09 [gentoo-dev] Request of news item review: 2013-03-29-udev-predictable-network-interface-names.en.txt Samuli Suominen
2013-03-31 1:06 ` [gentoo-dev] " Philip Webb
2013-03-31 1:17 ` Samuli Suominen
2013-03-31 11:36 99% ` Andreas K. Huettel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox